PAINT-P Microtrial
In the PAINT-P Microtrial, we investigated the effectiveness of two types of behavioral therapy techniques separately. Based on this research and a meta-analysis we conducted, we developed a brief parent training program that includes both types of techniques.
What is the goal of the study?
In the PAINT-P Microtrial, we examined the effectiveness of various elements of behavioral parent training for children with ADHD symptoms. We aimed to determine which techniques work best: antecedent techniques or consequent techniques. To this end, we developed a brief "crash course". In this crash course, parents learn techniques to elicit desired behavior in their child (antecedent techniques) or techniques to reinforce their child's desired behavior (consequent techniques). We also explored whether these techniques are more effective for children with motivation problems or those who struggle more with planning and organizing. Additionally, we looked at whether parental motivation, expectations, and competencies influence the outcomes.
How is the study structured?
To investigate this, we compared three groups. Parents were randomly assigned to one of the following: the antecedent crash course, the consequent crash course, or a six-week waitlist. Through daily phone calls before, immediately after, two weeks after, and three months after the training, we assessed whether the specific problem behavior had decreased. Parents also completed online questionnaires before, during, and after the training.
How far along is the study?
The study has now been completed. In total, parents of 92 children from across the Netherlands participated. The results have been published in scientific journals and presented at (inter)national conferences. Parents were enthusiastic about the training, and we found positive results from both trainings (antecedent and consequent interventions) in improving (daily measurements of) problem behavior in children with ADHD.